Bohemian Rhapsody: All Glitz, Little Else

Director: Bryan Singer
Writers: Anthony McCarten (story), Peter Morgan (story), Anthony McCarte (screenplay)
Cast: Rami Malek, Lucy Boynton, Gwilym Lee, Ben Hardy, Joseph Mazzello, Aidan Gillen
Genre: Drama/Biography
Run-time: 2h 13m
Rating: 2.5/5
If the quality of a
movie was determined by the set design and re-creation of events,
Bohemian Rhapsody would be one of the very best. Fortunately, the quality of a
movie of such a genre, apart from historical accuracy, also depends on the feelings
it manages to evoke in the audience. It is in this aspect that this Queen movie
advertised as the Freddy Mercury biopic royally fails.
Going into the
theatre, I was aware of the initial international critical reaction. The RT (RottenTomato)
score stood at 51% meaning only 51 % of the total reviewers liked or loved the
movie. As such I was not expecting it to be anything special. Still I was
hoping it was a good movie. I WANTED it to be a good movie. But the reality is,
it is at best an average movie. It struggles to decide whose story to tell. It
tries to be a Mercury biopic as well as a Queen history and manages to only
touch both things superficially.
The movie offers very
little about Mercury and Queen that isn’t already in the media and in YouTube
documentaries. In a movie of its scale and genre, one expects to be reeled in
both emotionally and mentally. And although Bohemian Rhapsody does try to hit
you in the heart with Freddie’s struggle with his sexuality and family, it
drowns in the glitz and the re-creation of iconic music videos and performances.
I’m in no way
questioning the importance of the re-creations. In fact, the movie pulls them
with aplomb. They feel as real as they get. The attention to detail is worthy
of all the praise. But the fact is, the film makers and the writers spend far
too much time and effort to re-creating them rather then focusing a bit more in
the story. The movies gives us information and they are readily available
thanks to Google and YouTube. Add to it the fact that a size-able chunk of these
information are inaccurate. Mercury’s introduction to the Band, Mercury
revealing having AIDS to the band-mates, the rearrangement of release dates are just
some examples. Properly told, all this would just be minor issues, artistic
freedom. But with a poor execution this has come front and center. In addition,
Queen’s and Mercury’s frenzied media controversy is set aside with just video
and text montages like it was a no biggie.
Then there’s the issue
with the songs. No, I’m not complaining about the rendition by Malek and Co. My
issue is with how the songs were used. The movie has 15! soundtracks and with queens
discography I knew quite a few brilliant songs were bound to be left out. What
I was not ready for was parts of songs being thrown around and sometimes placed
in such a way it undermined the tone of the scene.
Having to wait to the
very end to listen to one complete Queen song was the worst part. However, when
the iconic Live Aid performance did come, and believe me the movie’s rendition
was flawless, it left me feeling those 20 precious movie minutes could have
been used to tell a more detailed and well developed story of the legend that
was Freddie Mercury. After all the re-creation of events, despite being
undoubtedly Herculean, is the bare minimum in a movie of its stature.
Comments